International Symposium
Health, Reproduction and
Sexuality:
Neoliberal-Authoritarian Modes of
Governing the Woman’s Body in Turkey
5-6 April 2018, Bremen University,
Germany
Neoliberalism has been hegemonic for the
last three decades in many parts of the world, with its
consequences of dismantling of welfare states,
imposition of austerity measures, restructuring of
health systems, and rising conservatism and
heteronormativity. While these developments have had
important implications for all gender and sexual
identities, they have particularly affected women due to
the accelerated precarisation of female labor power,
increasing regression in women’s reproductive rights and
access to health care, as well as expanding
commodification and control of life in general, of
women’s bodies in particular. Indeed, be it during the
initial aggressive years of neoliberalism in 1980’s, its
“reformist” period in the 1990s, or its recent phase
beginning with 2000’s that paved the way to increasing
authoritarianism (as seen in the triumph of conservative
and right-wing parties in the Unites States, Eastern
Europe, Turkey, and elsewhere), the bio-political and
the bio-economic dimensions of governmentality have been
distinctive and determining features of all neoliberal
rationalities and regimes, and have targeted women in
the first place. The increasing control of poor and
ethnic minority women’s fertility, the expansion of IVF
and egg markets, the commodification of pregnancy and
motherhood through surrogacy, the privatization of
gynecological and obstetrical care, and the ongoing
pathologisation of different life phases such as
menopause by the pharmaceutical industries are some
illustrative cases among many. While each of these areas
include varying levels of surveillance and control on
women, the authoritarian forms of government, which are
becoming more and more the explicit norm in many
neoliberal settings, create a direct assault to women’s
bodies, health and sexuality by legitimizing political
and/or sexual violence through conservative notions like
family, religion, nationalism or patriarchy, and by
encouraging hypermasculinity. The aim of this symposium
is to analyze such recent developments in terms of the
governing of women’s bodies within neoliberal and
authoritarian regimes that are often intertwined. The
Turkish case, without being unique, offers a privileged
laboratory for an in-depth analysis of such dynamic
transformations which have been operative in an
accelerated manner in this specific national context for
the recent years.
Neoliberalism began to be effective in the
1980s in Turkey, and then went through a period of
recession in the 1990s before being revived under the
leadership of the AKP (Justice and Development Party), a
then newly established neo-conservative party that has
been in power since 2002. After its initial reformist
period, the political tendency towards authoritarianism
became more visible towards the middle of 2000s. It was shaped by increasing centralization and personalization of power, and by the radicalization of conservatism and nationalism in particular since the constitutional amendment of 2010. Within this new neoliberal-authoritarian setting, offensive pronatalism represents a crucial issue that has led to a renewal of discourses, practices and regulations as to what concerns reproductive rights, family/gender policies and the administration of sexuality. Accordingly, women’s central role in
reproductive and domestic work was reaffirmed as a state
value, while contradictorily their reinsertion in the
labor market was also encouraged (albeit mostly on a
part-time basis); abortion was reopened to
political/religious debate for the first time since its
legalization in 1983, which resulted in a transfer to
the private sector of a till-then state service; IVF
benefited from insurance coverage but the expanding
restrictions for access have provoked new
social/economic inequalities and new discriminations
against singles and same-sex couples; surrogacy as well
as egg and sperm donation, although formally forbidden,
have nevertheless been tolerated in adjusted forms; the
abuse of caesareans have been blamed by the public
authorities for pronatalist reasons but the private
hospitals where their boom is the most significant have
been exposed to lesser regulations; the policing of even
pregnant women’s dress codes has been encouraged by the
policymakers, while at the same time the beauty market
of antiaging and esthetic operations has grown rapidly;
the criminalization of both sexual violence/abuse and
sexual deviance (incest) has been loosened, while
sexuality itself is both policed and made uniform,
rendering trans and homosexual communities increasingly
marginalized and extramarital unions and pregnancies
more and more fragile. Thinking through all these
issues, without any doubt, it would be vain to try to
identify a single or homogeneous mode of governing the
woman’s body in today’s Turkey. The neoliberal,
authoritarian or conservative ways of governing women
and their bodies may actually converge in many ways,
thereby constituting hybrid regimes; or on the contrary,
they may turn out to be irreconcilable and entirely
antagonistic, according to the context. In this
symposium, we propose to explore this complex diversity,
which, in our hypothesis, is an emblematic feature not
only of the Turkish context but of most of the current
neoliberal and gendered settings in general.
We call upon original contributions from
different branches of social sciences (sociology, gender
studies, medical anthropology, history, political
science, or governmentality studies) to examine the
various ways in which gendered bodies are governed by
neoliberal, conservative, authoritarian or religious
discourses, policies and practices in contemporary
Turkey, in the areas of health, reproduction and
sexuality. These various ways can be analyzed at
different levels: (i) representations of the woman’s
body (political, media, religious, industrial,
juridical, feminist);
(ii) interventions on and transformations
of the woman’s body (biomedical or disciplinary via
care, or through violence); (iii) commodification of the
woman’s body or its organs or biological material. The
papers can follow these research lines by focusing on a
specific policy field (family/marriage policies, health
policies, abortion policies, etc.), on a specific
object/sector (ARTs, sexually transmissible diseases,
anorexia, aesthetic surgery, etc.), on a
specific subject of government (religious or ethnic
minority women, lesbian and trans women, feminist
groups, etc.), or they can rather choose to
propose a transversal or comparative analysis of
different objects, fields and subjects. We privilege the
analysis of the period that starts with the strong
neoliberal turn of early 2000s until now, but are open
to more historical accounts. Contributions that
highlight autonomous practices, resistance forms, and
production of alternatives to the institutionalized body
regimes also enter in the scope of this symposium. Last
but not least, while focusing on Turkey, we encourage
international and transnational comparisons as well.
Submission Guidelines
Please send your abstracts of around 800 words as
well as a short biography, to bremensymposium@gmail.com
Before December 7th, 2017. The abstracts
should offer a precise description of your research
object, methodology and data if it is based on a
research. Notifications of acceptance will be sent by
December 15th, 2017. If your abstract is accepted, you
will be asked to provide a full paper by March 1st,
2018. We may cover the travel and/or accommodation
expenses in accordance with the budget of the symposium.
Date and Place of the Symposium
The Symposium will be held on 5-6 April
2018 at Gästehaus der Universität Bremen,
Teerhof 58, 28199,
Bremen, Germany
Organizing Committee
Ayse Dayi, University of Lausanne,
Switzerland
Sezin Topçu, CNRS-Ehess, France
Betül Yarar (Organizing Committee Chair),
Bremen University, Germany
For inquiries please email Betul Yarar: yarar@uni-bremen.de
***This symposium is organized thanks to a financial support from Bremen University, from The Philipp Schwartz Initiative of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and from the French National Research Agency (ANR “Hypmedpro” Project-Ehess-Paris)***
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.